Contents • • • • • • • • • • • • • [] Syntax template function-declaration (1) template requires constraint function-declaration (2) (since C++20) function-declaration-with-placeholders (3) (concepts TS) export template function-declaration (4) (until C++11) [] Explanation parameter-list - a non-empty comma-separated list of the, each of which is either, a, a, or a of any of those. As with any template, parameters may be (since C++20) function-declaration - a. The function name declared becomes a template name. Constraint (C++20) - a which restricts the template parameters accepted by this function template function-declaration-with-placeholders (concepts TS) - a where the type of at least one parameter uses the placeholder or a specifier: the template parameter list will have one invented parameter for each placeholder. Template monster has got the best wordpress template in the. Choose Your Template We are sure you’ll find a perfect template for your business among over. Template to use to write a reference letter for employment or academics, with tips for what to include and how to write a reference letter. Getting Started. Coding an HTML email isn't much different than coding a website was back in the late '90s. The same design tools are used to produce your final result. And the same general design principles are still in play: contrast, repetition, proximity, and alignment are all important. In this section, we'll go over some. ![]() Export was an optional modifier which declared the template as exported (when used with a class template, it declared all of its members exported as well). Files that instantiated exported templates did not need to include their definitions: the declaration was sufficient. Implementations of export were rare and disagreed with each other on details. (until C++11) When placeholders (either auto or placeholders) appear in the parameter list of a function declaration or of a function template declaration, one invented template parameter for each placeholder is appended to the template parameter list. Void f ( auto (auto:: * ) ( auto ) ); // #1 template void f (T (U:: * ) (V ) ); // same as #1 template void f (Array * ); // #2 (assuming Array is a class template) template void f (Array * ); // same as #2 void g1 ( const C1 *, C2 & ); // #3 (assuming C1 and C2 are concepts) template void g1 ( const T *, U & ); // same as #3 (concepts TS) [] Function template instantiation A function template by itself is not a type, or a function, or any other entity. No code is generated from a source file that contains only template definitions. In order for any code to appear, a template must be instantiated: the template arguments must be determined so that the compiler can generate an actual function (or class, from a class template). [] Explicit instantiation template return-type name ( parameter-list ); (1) template return-type name ( parameter-list ); (2) extern template return-type name ( parameter-list ); (3) (since C++11) extern template return-type name ( parameter-list ); (4) (since C++11). ![]() ![]() 4) Explicit instantiation declaration with template argument deduction for all parameters An explicit instantiation definition forces instantiation of the function or member function they refer to. It may appear in the program anywhere after the template definition, and for a given argument-list, is only allowed to appear once in the program. An explicit instantiation declaration (an extern template) prevents implicit instantiations: the code that would otherwise cause an implicit instantiation has to use the explicit instantiation definition provided somewhere else in the program. A trailing template-argument can be left unspecified in an explicit instantiation of a function template specialization or of a member function template specialization if it can be from the function parameter. ![]() Template A f (A, A ); // overload #1 template A f (A, A ); // same as #1 template A f (A, A ); // overload #2 Two expressions involving template parameters are called equivalent if two function definitions that contain these expressions would be the same under, that is, the two expressions contain the same sequence of tokens whose names are resolved to same entities via name lookup, except template parameters may be differently named. Two are never equivalent. (since C++20). Template void f (Args. Args ); // #1 template void f (T1 a1, Args. Args ); // #2 template void f (T1 a1, T2 a2 ); // #3 f ( ); // calls #1 f ( 1, 2, 3 ); // calls #2 f ( 1, 2 ); // calls #3; non-variadic template #3 is more // specialized than the variadic templates #1 and #2 During template argument deduction within the partial ordering process, template parameters don't require to be matched with arguments, if the argument is not used in any of the types considered for partial ordering. Template void f (T ); // #1: template overload template void f (T * ); // #2: template overload void f ( double ); // #3: nontemplate overload template void f ( int ); // #4: specialization of #1 f ( 'a' ); // calls #1 f (new int ( 1 ) ); // calls #2 f ( 1.0 ); // calls #3 f ( 1 ); // calls #4 [] Function overloads vs function specializations Note that only non-template and primary template overloads participate in overload resolution. The specializations are not overloads and are not considered. Only after the overload resolution selects the best-matching primary function template, its specializations are examined to see if one is a better match. Template void f (T ); // #1: overload for all types template void f ( int * ); // #2: specialization of #1 for pointers to int template void f (T * ); // #3: overload for all pointer types f (new int ( 1 ) ); // calls #3, even though specialization of #1 would be a perfect match It is important to remember this rule while ordering the header files of a translation unit. For more examples of the interplay between function overloads and function specializations, expand below: Consider first some scenarios where the argument-dependent lookup is not employed. For that, we use the call (f ) (t ). As described in, wrapping the function name in parentheses is suppressing the argument-dependent lookup. • Multiple overloads of f ( ) declared before the point-of-reference (POR) in g ( ). #3 Whenever the arguments are some C++ basic types, there are no ADL-associated namespaces. Hence, those scenarios are identical with the non-ADL examples above. For detailed rules on overload resolution, see [] Function template specialization This section is incomplete Reason: 14.8[temp.fct.spec] (note that 14.8.1[temp.arg.explicit] is already in full specialization article: either function specifics go here: lack of partials, interaction with function overloads, or just refer to that [] Defect reports The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards. DR Applied to Behavior as published Correct behavior C++14 deduction failed when A was from a pack, and there was no empty pack tie-breaker deduction allowed, tie-breaker added [] See Also • •.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2018
Categories |